Updated Profile Design section

This commit is contained in:
bluetooth-mdw 2015-09-29 11:12:37 +01:00
parent 5b54d1d3c1
commit 393cb25bc0
1 changed files with 13 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@ -6,18 +6,6 @@ Profile Design
### OPEN:
D3. Simplify the IO Pin Service, possible to expose the edge connector pins only. Possibly drop it to save memory and use the event service to transport pin values in either direction. Needs further thought.
* Update: Removed all pin characteristics except for pin 0, pin 1 and pin 2.
D5. Generic Attribute Service: profile design doc/report doesnt show it and its mandatory (issue with Bluetooth Developer Studio).
D9. DFU services uses a different base UUID to the other custom services. Is this deliberate?
D10. Characteristics in the DFU service use a different base UUID to the parent service. Is this deliberate?
D11. What are the data types for DFU Control and DFU Flash Code? Assumed uint8 and array of uint8.
### CLOSED:
@ -25,17 +13,30 @@ D1. Lose the System LED State characteristic since it cannot be controlled from
D2. Lose the Scrolling State characteristic complexity and memory constraints. DONE.
D3. Simplify the IO Pin Service, possible to expose the edge connector pins only. Possibly drop it to save memory and use the event service to transport pin values in either direction. Needs further thought.
* Update: Removed all pin characteristics except for pin 0, pin 1 and pin 2.
D4. Generic Access Service: Peripheral Privacy Flag is optional and I dont think we need it. Ditto Reconnection Address, ditto Peripheral Preferred Connection Parameters --> Removed optional characteristics Peripheral Privacy Flag, Reconnection Address and Peripheral Preferred Connection Parameters from Generic Access Service.
D5. Generic Attribute Service: profile design doc/report doesnt show it and its mandatory (issue with Bluetooth Developer Studio).
D6. Device Information Service: All characteristics are optional. Which ones do we really want/need? Save a little memory --> Removed PnP ID, IEEE 11073-20601 Regulatory Certification Data List, System ID and Software Revision String characteristics.
D7. Why does LED Matrix State support “Write Without Response”? I think this should be plain “Write” so that no further writes are made until theres been an ACK back from the previous one. Changed.
D8. MicroBit Requirements supports Write. This is (ironically and puntastically) wrong. Client should not be able to modify the requirements the MicroBit has. Changed.
D9. DFU services uses a different base UUID to the other custom services. Is this deliberate?
D10. Characteristics in the DFU service use a different base UUID to the parent service. Is this deliberate?
D11. What are the data types for DFU Control and DFU Flash Code? Assumed uint8 and array of uint8.
D12. Microbit DFU service not in the profile design. Added. Needs descriptions and data types confirming.
Profile Testing
---------------